That is an version of The Atlantic Every day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the largest tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends the most effective in tradition. Join it right here.
Kamala Harris is within the midst of a media blitz this week, together with an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes yesterday night and an look on The Late Present With Stephen Colbert tonight. However she can be dipping into the world of mega-popular, not straightforwardly journalistic podcasts—notably showing on the present Name Her Daddy final weekend. I spoke with my colleague Helen Lewis, who covers the podcast-sphere, about why Donald Trump and Harris are each spending time on these types of reveals, what these interviews keep away from, and the way unbiased podcasters turned main gamers in political media.
The New Mainstream
Lora Kelley: How does the worth to the viewer of a standard press interview—one targeted on the particular points and insurance policies of the race—differ from that of a life-style podcast?
Helen Lewis: Roughly talking, there are two forms of sit-down conversations in politics: the accountability interview and the talk-show look. One focuses on pinning down candidates on their previous statements and their future guarantees; the opposite, which most podcasts fall into, tries to grasp the candidate as an individual. The latter aren’t essentially delicate choices—being charismatic and interesting whereas making small speak or fielding deeply private questions is a ability in itself. (And I discovered Donald Trump’s look on Theo Von’s podcast, the place he talked about his elder brother’s wrestle with alcoholism, very revealing certainly.)
However solely with the accountability interviews do you get candidates pressed repeatedly on questions that they’re making an attempt to dodge. On Logan Paul’s podcast, Impaulsive, Trump was requested concerning the transmission of fentanyl over the border, and he received away with rambling about how “unbelievable” the German shepherds Border Patrol officers use are. On Lex Fridman’s podcast, Trump asserted that he might simply type out the disaster in Ukraine—and that was it. Who wants particulars? When Kamala Harris went on Name Her Daddy, the host, Alex Cooper, gave her an opportunity to put out her message on reproductive rights however didn’t, for instance, problem her on whether or not she helps third-trimester abortions, that are deeply divisive.
Lora: From the angle of a political marketing campaign, are there any downsides to showing on a podcast resembling Name Her Daddy?
Helen: The apparent criticism of Harris showing on Name Her Daddy, which has a younger, feminine viewers, is that she already has an enormous lead amongst younger girls aged 18–25. You may say the identical about Trump showing on podcasts which might be common with younger males. However each teams include many individuals who can be undecided about whether or not to vote in any respect.
Lora: Harris has carried out some conventional press interviews throughout this marketing campaign cycle, together with her 60 Minutes interview yesterday. However are we in a brand new period by which chats with pleasant podcasters rival (and even overtake) conventional media interviews?
Helen: Effectively, fairly. An article I take into consideration so much is John Herrman’s 2015 “Entry Denied,” by which he requested why an A-lister—somebody like Kim Kardashian—would give an interview to a star journal if she had one thing to promote, as an alternative of merely placing an image on Instagram. Why cooperate with the previous guard of media when they’re not the gatekeepers of consideration? Herrman argued that the standard media was struggling a “lack of energy leading to a lack of entry leading to additional lack of energy.”
That dynamic has now migrated to politics. The legacy manufacturers not have a monopoly on individuals’s consideration, and the net proper, particularly, has been extraordinarily profitable in constructing an alternate, extremely partisan media. Fox Information is not the rightmost finish of the spectrum—past that’s Tucker Carlson’s podcast, or the Every day Wire community, or Newsmax, or Elon Musk’s X.
Now candidates have a tendency to speak to the standard media solely once they need to reset the narrative about them, as a result of different journalists nonetheless watch 60 Minutes or no matter it could be. There’s nonetheless a noisiness round an enormous legacy interview that you simply don’t get with, say, Name Her Daddy—even when extra individuals find yourself consuming the latter.
Lora: Are these podcasts actually doing something new, or are they largely replicating conventional media interviews with out the identical requirements and accountability?
Helen: The higher ones attempt for impartiality and don’t, for instance, reveal their questions upfront—however many political podcasts are wrapped in an ecosystem the place big-name friends imply extra promoting income, and thus larger earnings for the hosts personally; plus, their solely hope of getting a second interview is that if the candidate feels the primary one was sympathetic. Examine that with 60 Minutes, which interviewed Trump so robustly in 2020 that he has requested for an apology.
I’m as responsible as anybody, however we have to cease treating these podcasts because the “different” media when they’re completely the mainstream lately. The highest ones have audiences as massive as, if not larger than, most legacy shops. In the event that they don’t need to rent all of the editorial infrastructure that conventional journalism has (resembling fact-checkers, analysis assistants, and many others.), or danger being unpopular by asking tough questions, that’s on them. Joe Rogan renewed his Spotify contract for $250 million. Alex Cooper signed a cope with SiriusXM this yr value $125 million. We must always cease treating the mega-podcasts like mom-and-pop outfits competing with chain shops. They’re behemoths.
Lora: You latterly wrote about The Joe Rogan Expertise, which is the top-listened-to podcast on Spotify and arguably probably the most influential behemoth of all of them. Why haven’t the candidates gone on the present but? Who from every ticket do you suppose would take advantage of sense as a visitor?
Helen: As I perceive it, Staff Trump would like to get on The Joe Rogan Expertise. The 2 politicians that Rogan adores are Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who at the moment are each working with the Republicans, and Staff Trump would hope to encourage a few of Rogan’s viewers of crunchy, COVID-skeptic libertarians to observe them in transferring from the unbiased/Democrat column to the GOP. However Rogan isn’t a full MAGA partisan like a few of his buddies, and Trump not too long ago mentioned that Rogan hasn’t requested him to look.
In any case, I feel Rogan would favor to speak to J. D. Vance, who could be very a lot a part of the heterodox Silicon Valley–refugee tendency that he admires. For the Democrats, Harris would possibly wrestle to loosen up into the stoner-wonderment vibe of Rogan, given the tight-laced marketing campaign she’s working. Rogan and Tim Walz might most likely have a superb chat about taking pictures deer and one of the best ways to barbecue.
Associated:
Listed here are three new tales from The Atlantic:
Right this moment’s Information
- Florida Governor Ron DeSantis introduced that roughly 8,000 Nationwide Guard members can be mobilized by the point Hurricane Milton, a Class 5 storm, makes landfall this week.
- The Supreme Court docket seems prone to uphold the Biden administration’s regulation of “ghost gun” kits, which permit individuals to purchase gun components and construct the weapons at dwelling.
- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that the Israeli navy has killed the substitute successors of the Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in an Israeli air strike final month.
Dispatches
Discover all of our newsletters right here.
Night Learn
They Had been Made With out Eggs or Sperm. Are They Human?
By Kristen V. Brown
The little clump of cells appeared virtually like a human embryo. Created from stem cells, with out eggs, sperm, or a womb, the embryo mannequin had a yolk sac and a proto-placenta, resembling a state that actual human embryos attain after roughly 14 days of growth. It even secreted hormones that turned a drugstore being pregnant check constructive.
To Jacob Hanna’s knowledgeable eye, the mannequin wasn’t excellent—extra like a tough sketch … However in 2022, when two college students burst into his workplace and dragged him to a microscope to point out him the cluster of cells, he knew his crew had unlocked a door to understanding an important stage of human growth. Hanna, a professor on the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, additionally knew that the mannequin would elevate some profound moral questions.
Extra From The Atlantic
Tradition Break
Learn. Lauren Elkin’s newest novel, Scaffolding, means that complete honesty can take a wedding solely thus far, Lily Meyer writes.
Watch (or skip). Joker: Folie à Deux (out now in theaters) has nothing attention-grabbing to say concerning the challenges of fame, Spencer Kornhaber writes.
Stephanie Bai contributed to this article.
Whenever you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
