The award mustn’t feed the AI-hype cycle.
That is Atlantic Intelligence, a e-newsletter by which our writers allow you to wrap your thoughts round synthetic intelligence and a brand new machine age. Enroll right here.
The record of Nobel laureates reads like a set of humanity’s best treasures: Albert Einstein, Marie Curie, Francis Crick, Toni Morrison. As of this morning, it additionally consists of two physicists whose analysis, within the Eighties, laid the foundations for contemporary synthetic intelligence.
Earlier right this moment, the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton for utilizing “instruments from physics to develop strategies which can be the muse of right this moment’s highly effective machine studying.” Hinton is usually known as a “godfather of AI,” and right this moment’s prize—one that’s supposed for these whose work has conferred “the best profit to humankind”—would appear to mark the generative-AI revolution, and tech executives’ grand pronouncements in regards to the prosperity that ChatGPT and its brethren are bringing, as a fait accompli.
Not so quick. Committee members asserting the prize, whereas gesturing to generative AI, didn’t point out ChatGPT. As a substitute, their focus was on the grounded methods by which Hopfield and Hinton’s analysis, which enabled the statistical evaluation of huge datasets, has remodeled physics, chemistry, biology, and extra. As I wrote in an article right this moment, the award “shouldn’t be taken as a prediction of a science-fictional utopia or dystopia to come back a lot as a recognition of all of the ways in which AI has already modified the world.”
AI fashions will proceed to alter the world, however AI’s confirmed functions shouldn’t be confused with Massive Tech’s prophecies. Machines that may “study” from giant datasets are the stuff of yesterday’s information, and superintelligent machines that exchange people stay the stuff of yesterday’s novels. Let’s not neglect that.
AI’s Penicillin and X-Ray Second
By Matteo Wong
Right this moment, John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton obtained the Nobel Prize in Physics for groundbreaking statistical strategies which have superior physics, chemistry, biology, and extra. Within the announcement, Ellen Moons, the chair of the Nobel Committee for Physics and a physicist at Karlstad College, celebrated the 2 laureates’ work, which used “basic ideas from statistical physics to design synthetic neural networks” that may “discover patterns in giant information units.” She talked about functions of their analysis in astrophysics and medical analysis, in addition to in each day applied sciences equivalent to facial recognition and language translation. She even alluded to the modifications and challenges that AI might carry sooner or later. However she didn’t point out ChatGPT, widespread automation and the ensuing international financial upheaval or prosperity, or the potential of eliminating all illness with AI, as tech executives are wont to do.
What to Learn Subsequent
- Right this moment’s Nobel Prize announcement targeted largely on using AI for scientific analysis. In an article final 12 months, I reported on how machine studying is making science sooner and fewer human, in flip “difficult the very nature of discovery.”
- Whether or not the longer term will probably be awash with superintelligent chatbots, nonetheless, is much from sure. In July, my colleague Charlie Warzel spoke with Sam Altman and Ariana Huffington about an AI-based health-care enterprise they lately launched, and got here away with the impression that AI is turning into an “business powered by blind religion.”
P.S.
A pair weeks in the past, I had the pleasure of talking with Terence Tao, maybe the world’s best dwelling mathematician, about his perceptions of right this moment’s generative AI and his imaginative and prescient for a completely new, “industrial-scale” arithmetic that AI might sooner or later allow. I discovered our dialog fascinating, and hope you’ll as effectively.
— Matteo
